Legal Opinion

Maytag Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1933No. 6888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a motion for a bill of particulars in a patent infringement suit.

The first item calls for: “I. The full particulars of defendant’s alleged collaboration with washing machine, manufacturers and sellers in delaying and attempting to prevent the issuance of the patent in suit, as charged in paragraph II of'the Bill of Complaint, giving the names of the washing machine manufacturers and sellers with whom defendant is alleged to have collaborated in such aetion, and the specific acts of alleged collaboration, and the times when, and the places where, and the persons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  2. O-So-Ezy Mop Co. v. Channell Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  3. McLeod Tire Corp. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. Beacon Folding Mach. Co. v. Rotary Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  5. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co. v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Control Instrument Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API