Legal Opinion
State v. Lombardo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 5, 1989No. 7002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to modify the defendant’s sentence pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-39. We find error.
The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. The defendant was tried and convicted by a jury of one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a), one count of attempted sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-70 (a), and one count of unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95 (a).
On September 23,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RaucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Johnson v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Mims v. Warden, State PrisonConnecticut Superior Court · 2003
- State v. Corrigan, No. Mv 10-6028 62 (Aug. 21, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.