Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Allen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1990No. 593PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*129DEL SOLE, Judge:

Daniel Allen, Appellant, was convicted of Driving Under the Influence (DUI), 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(1) and (a)(4). Post-verdict motions were denied and Allen was sentenced. On appeal he raises five issues. Because all of the issues are meritless, we affirm the trial court’s judgment of sentence.

Allen’s conviction for DUI was the culmination of a complicated procedural process. Allen was arrested for DUI under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(1) and (a)(4). Police took him to Ellwood City Hospital where a blood sample was taken. The sample was given to the arresting officer who took it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. MahaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. MontiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. ZugaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. In Re Upset Price Tax SaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API