Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1988No. 1628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for robbery and possession of an instrument of crime. Appellant first contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call alibi witnesses. In addition, appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to charge the jury that certain identification testimony should be received with caution; (2) improperly admitting hearsay testimony regarding the contents of certain police reports; (3) denying his motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor made a prejudicial remark during closing argument; (4) striking a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaynesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API