Legal Opinion

Gelzhiser v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1965No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiff, Oliver Gelzhiser, filed a complaint in assumpsit against J. Homer Fisher, Bernard L. Stoecklein and George F. Stoecklein d/b/a Penn Lincoln Memorial Park. At the conclusion of the testimony, the lower Court directed verdicts for the defendants. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied, Judgment was never entered on the verdicts. Plaintiff appealed to this Court “from the lower Court’s Opinion and Decree dismissing the motion for a new trial.”

In Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568, 207 A. 2d 860, we said: “As stated in the footnote in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Menyo v. SpharSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Denmon v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Hazle Township Supervisors' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. O'DONNELL v. BachelorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Mitchum v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API