Legal Opinion

Mitchum v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1987No. 1578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This appeal lies from an Order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

The underlying cause of action finds its basis in the combination of the pension plans of the three companies whose (successive) corporate mergers produced what is now the Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO).

In January, 1966, Atlantic Refining Co. merged with Richfield Oil Corp., forming ARCO, and, at the same time combined the assets of the companies’ employee pension plans into a single uniform plan. In July, 1969, the Atlantic Independent Union (AIU), pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brandschain v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Lengyel v. Frank Black, Jr., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gelzhiser v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FloodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Parents Against Abuse in Schools v. Williamsport Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. FloodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API