Legal Opinion

In re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 10, 1999No. MDL No. 1206PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER NO. 75 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS

JACK, District Judge.

On April 5 through 9, 1999, came on to be held a fairness hearing to consider granting approval to eight proposed settlement agreements in the above-styled litigation. For the reasons stated herein, the Court FINDS that all eight of the proposed settlement agreements should be approved.1

1. JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction over the cases in this multidistrict litigation pursuant to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation’s transfer order of January 14, 1998, and…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re: Cendant Corporation Prides LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. KgaaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API