Legal Opinion

Shatto v. Erie R.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1903No. 1,136PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

DAY, Circuit Judge.

This case was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision between one of the engines attached to a train of the defendant company and the vehicle in which the plaintiff was attempting to cross the track. Upon hearing the testimony for the plaintiff, the trial judge *679directed a verdict in favor of the company upon the ground of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff at the time of the collision. This proceeding brings into review the correctness of that instruction.

It may be conceded at the outset that there was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. FarraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Cowen v. GrabowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Dernberger v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  4. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Morehead v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API