Legal Opinion

Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Andrews

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1904No. 1,889PublishedCited by 51 opinions

-In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by Andrews against the railway company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him in a street crossing accident wherein he was struck *66by one of the company’s passenger trains. The petition charged the company with negligence in propelling its train over the crossing at a high rate of speed without ringing the bell or giving other timely warning. The answer denied the statements of the petition, and alleged that the injury was due to plaintiff’s negligence in not exercising proper care and caution for his own protection. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Denver City Tramway Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API