Legal Opinion

Whitnack v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1908No. 15,261PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from tlie district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Feost, Judge. •

1Opinion of the Court

Good, O.

The plaintiff, Charles O. Whitnack, recovered a judgment against the defendant railway company for damages to a shipment of potatoes while in transit from Omaha, *466Nebraska, to Fort Worth, Texas, alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence. The defendant has brought the case to this court on appeal.

In February, 1905, plaintiff shipped from Omaha, over defendant’s line of railway, two car-loads of potatoes consigned to himself at Fort Worth, Texas. Defendant’s line of railway extended no further than Kansas City, Missouri, and from that point the potatoes were to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grieve v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Fox v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railroad v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. VandeventerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Suburban Water Co. v. Oakmont BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Nye-Schneider-Fowler Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Knapp v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste, Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. McMillenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Fuller v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API