Legal Opinion

West Virginians for Life, Inc. v. Smith

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 20, 1996No. Civil Action 1:96-0068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

FABER, District Judge.

Pending before the court are the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees & Expenses filed by the plaintiffs on September 12, 1996, and the Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses filed by plaintiffs on November 1,1996. Plaintiffs’ counsel, James Bopp, Jr., Bopp Coleson & Bostrom, Terre Haute, Indiana, and William C. Porth, Robinson & McElwee, Charleston, West Virginia, submit their fee petitions under the Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The petitions include time expended by other members of Bopp’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2015
  2. In Re Vernon-WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. McGee v. ColeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
  4. Bostic v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000
  5. National Right to Life v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API