Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Smith

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 2015No. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE KERN, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on Amount of Appeal-Related Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 299). Plaintiffs request $368,827.50 in attorneys’ fees, $1,942.37 in costs, and any enhancement of the fee award deemed reasonable by the Court. For reasons set. forth below, the motion is granted in the amount of $298,742.77, which includes $296,847.50 in attorneys’ fees and $1,895.27 in costs.

I. Factual Background1. Plaintiffs Mary Bishop and Sharon Baldwin, an unmarried same-sex couple, challenged Oklahoma’s constitutional ’amendment defining…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleopatra DeLeon v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Cleopatra DeLeon v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Curl v. LytalDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
  4. Laca v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
  5. Phillips & Jordan, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API