Legal Opinion

National Right to Life v. Gardner

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 2, 1997No. CV-96-509-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

National Right to Life v. Gardner CV-96-509-M 07/02/97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE National Right to Life Political Action Committee State Fund, et al. v. Civil No. 96-509-M William M. Gardner, et al. O R D E R Plaintiffs seek attorneys' fees pursuant to

42 U.S.C.A. § 1988

following resolution of their civil rights action challenging the constitutionality of certain New Hampshire statutes limiting expenditures by political committees in support of candidates in a state election. Defendants object. Section 1988 allows an award of reasonable attorneys' fees to a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. New Hampshire Right to Life Political Action Committee v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API