Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Burghorn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1920No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa; Cross (Grien S.), J. Bill by Charles Johnson against James, Burghom to restrain the trapping of muskrats and other fur-bearing animals. From the decree rendered, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed to restrain the defendant from trapping and otherwise taking muskrats and other fur-bearing animals from the property known as Eastman’s or Johnson’s Island, in Grand river, in the county of Ottawa. The appended map or plat, taken from the record, was, introduced and used in evidence upon the hearing of the case. It will aid in an understanding of the situation. We compile from the stipulated statement of facts the following:

That the plaintiff is the owner by grant and in actual possession of the lands described in the bill of complaint, and has been in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Giddings v. RogalewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Archer v. Greenville Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Wear v. Kansas Ex Rel. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. St. Helen Shooting Club v. MogleMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Conran v. GirvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Hall v. WantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Munninghoff v. Wisconsin Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API