Legal Opinion

Wear v. Kansas Ex Rel. Brewster

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 26, 1917No. 30PublishedCited by 35 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a petition for mandamus to require the Treasurer of the State to transfer certain funds from a special account to the general revenue funds of the State, so that'they can be used for paying the expenses of government. The money in question was collected under the State Laws of 1913, c. 259, requiring payment of ten per cent; of the market value on the river bank of sand taken by private persons or corporations from the bed of streams subject to the control of the State. It was paid by the plaintiffs in error for sand taken from the Kansas River at Topeka, and it was kept as a separate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API