Legal Opinion

St. Helen Shooting Club v. Mogle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.

In 1904 the St. Helen Development Company was the owner in fee of all the land bordering on Lake St. Helen, except certain rights which were subsequently acquired. In that year it conveyed the exclusive hunting rights to the plaintiff. The conveyance will be found in the margin. 1 An additional 12% acres of land bordering on the lake have been conveyed to the club. Upon this parcel a club house and cottages have been erected for the convenience of its members, and the club is being maintained and regulated by rules and enjoyed by the members thereof. The defendant Mogle purchased in fee a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bingham v. SaleneOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Saratoga State Waters Corp. v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Council v. . SanderlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pigorsh v. FahnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Kewin v. Board of Education of the Melvindale-Northern Allen Park Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Alford v. FinchSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. Little v. KinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Putnam v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API