Legal Opinion

Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 28, 1934No. 355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

1. The motion to dismiss criticizes the bill for prolixity, invoking Equity Rule No. 25 (28 USCA § 723); also, for multifarious-' ness and misjoinder under Equity Rule 26 (28 USCA § 723). The motion to dismiss is not well taken on these grounds.

2. The right of the plaintiffs as preferred stockholders of the Alabama Power Company, for themselves and other preferred stockholders, to maintain the bill of complaint in the name of the corporation, is challenged. The settled rule is that stockholders cannot maintain a bill in the nature of this •one, to review transactions of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Algernon Blair Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1982
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1935
  4. Rogers v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. Jacob Robbins v. County of Pima, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API