Legal Opinion

Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided February 22, 1935No. 355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The law in this case was settled on the motion to dismiss for want of equity. 8 F. Supp. 893. I do not mean settled for good, but settled as far as this case is concerned, in the District Court. It was settled in this way: That under the Tenth Amendment, or -regardless of it, the government of the United States would have no right, within the limits of a state, to conduct any private proprietary business unless it did so in a way that was tied to some express or implied constitutional grant of power. If it was tied to such a grant of power, then the power carried with it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1942
  2. Rogers v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1936
  4. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1937
  5. Rogers v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API