Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
The law in this case was settled on the motion to dismiss for want of equity. 8 F. Supp. 893. I do not mean settled for good, but settled as far as this case is concerned, in the District Court. It was settled in this way: That under the Tenth Amendment, or -regardless of it, the government of the United States would have no right, within the limits of a state, to conduct any private proprietary business unless it did so in a way that was tied to some express or implied constitutional grant of power. If it was tied to such a grant of power, then the power carried with it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grant v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1942
- Rogers v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1936
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1937
- Rogers v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962