Legal Opinion

In Re Andrew Westhem and Emily Westhem, Bankrupts. C. Douglas Wikle v. Andrew Westhem and Emily Westhem

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1981No. 79-3127Published

1Opinion of the Court

642 F.2d 1139

7 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1246

In re Andrew WESTHEM and Emily Westhem, Bankrupts.

C. Douglas WIKLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Andrew WESTHEM and Emily Westhem, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79-3127.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 3, 1980.

Decided March 23, 1981.

C. Douglas Wikle, Wikle & Henry, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard M. Moneymaker, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before GIBSON*, SNEED and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

1

This case…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re LeechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Los Angeles Finance Co. v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. In Re Andrew Westhem and Emily Westhem, Bankrupts. C. Douglas Wikle v. Andrew Westhem and Emily WesthemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. McCarthy v. StandishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API