Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Standish

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1923No. Civ. No. 4542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to enjoin the defendants from obstructing certain alleged watercourses. The defendants answered by denying many allegations and at the same time filed a cross-complaint asking that the plaintiff be enjoined from cutting and maintaining certain ditches and discharging across the lands of the defendants excess waters. A trial was had before the trial court sitting without a jury. On certain issues the trial court found for the plaintiff and on some issues it found for the defendants, but the defendants, being dissatisfied with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Andrew Westhem and Emily Westhem, Bankrupts. C. Douglas Wikle v. Andrew Westhem and Emily WesthemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Andrew Westhem and Emily Westhem, Bankrupts. C. Douglas Wikle v. Andrew Westhem and Emily WesthemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API