Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1997No. 71057PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions by jury of three counts of forcible sodomy, one count of forcible rape and one count of first degree burglary. We affirm.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. We view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Kezer, 918 S.W.2d 874, 875 (Mo.App. E.D. 1996).

The victim lived in an apartment and the crimes were committed in the early morning hours shortly after she had gone to bed. According to the victim, her attacker “smelled of alcohol.” The police found shoe impressions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. CannadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. HuchtingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. People v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BegleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Rathbun v. Cato Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API