Legal Opinion

State v. Huchting

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1996No. 65861, 68410PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Defendant Charles Huchting appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis for forcible rape, forcible sodomy and felony stealing. He was sentenced to consecutive sentences of thirty years for the first two counts, and a seven-year consecutive sentence for the third count.

This is a consolidated appeal of defendant’s direct appeal and his Rule 29.15 motion. We need not consider the 29.15 motion because it has not been briefed. “Allegations of error that are not briefed or are not properly briefed on appeal shall not be considered by this court except…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. State v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. ColbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API