Legal Opinion
King County v. Olson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 25, 1972No. 1441-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C. J.
Petitioners Graham seek review by cer-tiorari of an order entered below in eminent domain proceedings, adjudicating the public use and necessity for the taking of their property.
Sometime prior to 1971, King County commenced proceedings to create a trail park between Lake Sammamish and Bothell, Washington. The park area was to be 7 miles in length with an approximate width of 100 feet from the bank on either side of the Sammamish River. Petitioners’ land is located within the proposed park area.
To acquire the land needed for the proposed park, including petitioners’ land, the King County…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Anderson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Bradley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- King County v. TheilmanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Lange v. SUP. CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Port of Edmonds v. Northwest Fur Breeders Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Pud v. NaftziWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2007