Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Public Utility District No. 2 v. North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLC

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2007No. 76755-6Published

1Concurrence

¶45 (concurring) — I agree wholeheartedly with the majority’s well-reasoned opinion. I write separately to emphasize that under Washington statutes, our legislature currently provides property owners with protections beyond those required by either the state or federal constitutions. For example, as members of the public, property owners receive notice of the preliminary legislative hearings held to determine whether to proceed with a condemnation. Additionally, they receive a personal notice and a hearing on use and necessity. Further, property owners in this state receive personal notice…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API