Legal Opinion

King County v. Theilman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1962No. 36136PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is a condemnation proceeding, authorized by the Board of County Commissioners of King County, to acquire land owned by relator.

By writ of certiorari, relator presents for our review an order of the trial court determining that the right of way “ . . . sought to be appropriated and used is really and in fact a public use . . . ”

The law applicable to respondents’ motion to quash the writ is so intertwined with the law pertaining to the merits of the cause that we deny the motion and proceed to a consideration of the merits. See First Nat. Bank of Everett v. Tiffany, 40 Wn. (2d) 193, 242 P.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hogue v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Sternoff v. SUP'R CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Tacoma School District No. 10 v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API