Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Shannon

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2008No. 27919Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

NAKAYAMA, J.

I respectfully dissent. Pursuant to the following discussion, I believe that the plain language of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 853-l(b) (1993 & Supp.2007) as it applies to HRS § 706-624(3) (1993 & Supp.2007) is ambiguous, and would hold that actual notice of the terms and conditions of a deferred acceptance of guilty plea (“DAG plea”) is sufficient to satisfy considerations of fairness to the defendant in this ease, Eric Kanoa Shannon (“Shannon”).

I. DISCUSSION

A. In My View, the Plain Language Of HRS § 853-l(b) As It Applies To HRS § 706-624(3) Is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & FinanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. RiveraHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SylvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Favio Ortega-BritoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API