State v. Shannon
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
NAKAYAMA, J.
I respectfully dissent. Pursuant to the following discussion, I believe that the plain language of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 853-l(b) (1993 & Supp.2007) as it applies to HRS § 706-624(3) (1993 & Supp.2007) is ambiguous, and would hold that actual notice of the terms and conditions of a deferred acceptance of guilty plea (“DAG plea”) is sufficient to satisfy considerations of fairness to the defendant in this ease, Eric Kanoa Shannon (“Shannon”).
I. DISCUSSION
A. In My View, the Plain Language Of HRS § 853-l(b) As It Applies To HRS § 706-624(3) Is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & FinanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RiveraHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SylvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Favio Ortega-BritoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.