Legal Opinion

Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & Finance

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. 16064PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Peter A. Crosby, an employee of the State of Hawai'i Department of Budget and Finance (DBF), appeals from judgment in a jury-waived trial entered against him and in favor of Defendants-Ap-pellees State of Hawai'i, DBF, State of Ha-wai'i Department of Accounting and General Services (DAGS), Yukio Takemoto, and Russel Nagata (collectively “the State”). We affirm.

I. Background

In 1988, the State Legislature appropriated $250,000.00 for the fiscal year 1988-89 to be expended by the DBF for a comprehensive management study of the state’s tourism program and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API