Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1947No. 30678PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The basis of relator's prayer for a writ of mandamus is that there is no evidence to sustain the respondent's decision.

Section 486-17a, General Code, provides, in part:

"The tenure of every officer, employee or subordinate in the classified service of the state, the counties, cities and city school districts thereof, holding a position under the provisions of this act, shall be during good behavior and efficient service; but any such officer, employee or subordinate may be removed for incompetency, inefficiency,dishonesty, * * * or any other acts of misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. World Exchange Bank v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilms v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Cater v. N. OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City Loan & Savings Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  4. Schumacher v. State Ex Rel. FurlongNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Perez v. Crown Equip. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API