Legal Opinion
United States v. Vederman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 21, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 15-346-2Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Bartle, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendant Herbert Vederman, pursuant to the Bah Reform Act of 1984,18 U.S.C. § 3143, for release pending appeal in this political corruption case. The facts of this case are set forth in detail in the court’s Memorandum in support of its Order addressing post-trial motions. See generally United States v. Fattah, 223 F.Supp.3d 336, 2016 WL 7839022, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145833 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2016).
Vederman was found guilty by a jury on all eight counts against him, specifically: Count One (conspiracy to commit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McDonnell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Connie M. HandyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.