United States v. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted appellants Christopher G. Wright, Ravinder (“Ravi”) S. Chawla, and Andrew Teitelman (“Appellants”) of honest services fraud in violation of, inter alia, 18 U.S.C. § 1346, mail fraud (referred to below as “traditional” fraud) in violation of, inter alia, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and conspiracy to commit these offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. After sentencing, the Supreme Court’s decision in Skilling v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2896, 177 L.Ed.2d 619 (2010), affected the law of honest services fraud. Among other arguments on…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Klein v. MadisonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- United States v. BottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. William JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.