Legal Opinion
United States v. Connie M. Handy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1985No. 85-3001PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Appellee’s motion for bail pending appeal requires an interpretation of an important provision of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, §§ 202-210, 98 Stat. 1837, 1976-1987 (codified at scattered sections of 18 U.S.C.). The Act provides that a defendant who has been convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment shall be detained pending appeal unless the court finds “that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released” and “that the appeal is not for purpose of *1280delay and raises a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Gary D. Gardner v. Edwin Pogue, Warden, Nevada State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Francis Martin Giancola and Charles A. Pifer, IICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Mark Allan BaykoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- State v. Scott Robertson(075326)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.