Mauseth v. Slayden
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered February 18, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury. The errors assigned are in the giving of certain instructions and in refusing to give certain instructions requested by the plaintiff. The plaintiff has brought only a partial statement of facts to this court. The trial judge has not certified that the statement contains all the material facts, matters and proceedings occurring in the cause, and defendant insists that the court will not pass upon the errors assigned, under the authority *513of Morgan v. Bankers’ Trust Co., 63 Wash. 476, 115 Pac. 1047. See, also, Weld v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Hersner v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Taylor v. AndresWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Miller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Deller v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Northern Life Insurance v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Rieper v. General Cigar Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Baskett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Darrell v. SalwtWashington Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.