Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Rubens
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1996No. D022890PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Plaintiffs Richard Cochran (Cochran) and his wife Ilia May Cochran filed a complaint against defendant Lawrence Rubens and others seeking recovery of damages for Cochran’s personal injury and his wife’s loss of consortium allegedly suffered as a result of defendants’ professional negligence. Rubens appeals from the court’s order denying his petition to stay the action and compel arbitration of plaintiffs’ claims against him. Rubens contends that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 1295, subdivision (c), the arbitration agreement Cochran signed when he saw Rubens…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Maggio, Inc. v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reigelsperger v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lindenstadt v. Staff Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Regents of University of California v. SheilyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cabrini Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. HaghverdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.