Legal Opinion

Osborn v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1982No. 66913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The city brought three successive eminent domain proceedings to acquire plaintiffs’ real property located in a residential area of Cedar Rapids. All were dismissed and the city thereafter condemned only two easements across the property. This mandamus action thereafter was brought on a theory that the property had in effect been “taken” and the city should be compelled to follow through with its earlier plans to acquire the land and pay compensation. The trial court held there had been no taking of the land and refused to issue the writ. On our de novo review we conclude there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Richmond Elks Hall Ass'n v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Phelps v. Board of Supervisors of Cty. of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Hammer v. County of IdaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Skaff v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fitzgarrald v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Nowlin v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Graham v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Kempf v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API