Legal Opinion

Strong v. Security Storage & Warehouse Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial on the minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtBodenbeck, J.

The question as to whether or not a mistake was made by the defendant in delivering the goods stored with it was one of fact which was submitted to the jury and the jury has found against the contention of the defendant. There is evidence to sustain this finding and there is no reason for disturbing it. The plaintiff’s testimony showed that his predecessor shipped from Bochester a No. 2 Kempsmith plain miller with a tag consigning the miller to itself with directions to notify the Simmons Machine Company. The receipt by the defendant for the machine delivered by the railroad company shows…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Transportation Co. v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Ball v. . LineyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Fairfax v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Bank of Oswego v. . DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Markoe v. Tiffany & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Terminal Warehouse & Refrigeration Co. v. Cross Transp. Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API