Legal Opinion

Fairfax v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1876PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We think this judgment must be reversed upon the ground that it clearly appears that the portmanteau was taken in charge by the defendant and transported to New York, and there deposited by it in its baggage-room. The defendant thus incurred the responsibility of a warehouseman, at least, without regard to the question which has been argued whether it became liable as a common carrier. When the plaintiff demanded the article it had disappeared, and no account is given of the cause of such disappearance. This is prima facie evidence of negligence. (Steers v. Liv., N.Y. and P. Sts. Co., 57…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burnell v. . the New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Steers v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hasbrouck v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Canfield v. . Baltimore Ohio R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Curtis v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API