Legal Opinion

McCollough v. Warfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1988No. 86-657PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, John E. McCollough, Mary R. McCollough, Marion W. McCollough, and Carolyn F. McCollough, appeal by permission from an interlocutory order dismissing their amended complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. See Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P.

The McColloughs filed the original complaint February 19, 1985, alleging breach of a contract signed January 20, 1984. On October 15, 1986, the trial court entered an order allowing discovery against defendants Richard P. Warfield and James R. Holloway (hereinafter "Warfield"). The McColloughs filed an amended complaint on November 26, 1986, after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bracy v. Sippial Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. McClendon v. City of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. McElrath v. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Matlack, Inc. v. Hupp Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Whitfield v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. ALFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. E & S FACILITIES, INC. v. Precision Chipper Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Garris v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Rodopoulos v. Sam Piki Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API