Legal Opinion

McClendon v. City of Boaz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1981No. 79-833, 79-834PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These appeals are by plaintiffs, neighboring private property owners, from a partial summary judgment for defendant City of Boaz in an inverse condemnation action arising from the digging of a drainage ditch across plaintiffs' properties by defendants City of Boaz and Housing Authority of the City of Boaz. The grant of summary judgment was based on the grounds that the claims were barred by the two-year statute of limitations for claims against municipalities under § 11-47-23 and §§11-47-190, -191, and -192 of the Alabama Code of 1975. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for trial on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bracy v. Sippial Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. ALFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. E & S FACILITIES, INC. v. Precision Chipper Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Looney v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API