Legal Opinion
Whitfield v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 21, 1985No. 83-1294PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Because, during the pendency of this appeal, Appellants effected a settlement with the City of Hamilton (not a party to this appeal), which settlement, on behalf of the minor Plaintiff (Tina Whitfield), was approved by the court and judgment entered accordingly and satisfied by payment and receipt thereof, the appeal of this cause as to Whitfield is mooted and it is hereby dismissed. Butler v. GAB BusinessServices, Inc., 416 So.2d 984 (Ala. 1982); Maddox v. Druid CityHospital Board, 357 So.2d 974 (Ala. 1978).
We do not agree with the Appellees' contention, however, that the settlement between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bracy v. Sippial Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- United States v. G. v. Johnson, and His Wife Letha JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Sessions v. Jack Cole CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- McClendon v. City of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- E & S FACILITIES, INC. v. Precision Chipper Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- McCollough v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Defco, Inc. v. Decatur Cylinder, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Catrett v. BALDWIN CTY. ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.