Legal Opinion

Russell v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1930No. 6135PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action to recover income taxes alleged to have been illegally collected- from the plaintiff. A jury trial was waived.

From the pleadings and proofs the court finds the following facts:

Findings of Fact.

During the years 1924 to 1927, inclusive, the plaintiff was a partner in the firm of Russell Index Company, composed of himself, J. P. Russell, J. C. Russell, and R. A. Dodds. During the years stated he received from said partnership certain incomes attributable to the execution of certain contracts between the partnership and local authorities of certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lucas v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Lucas v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Reed v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  5. Blair v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API