Legal Opinion

Reed v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 25, 1929No. 4019PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In its general appropriation act of 1919 for the two fiscal years beginning June 1, 1919, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania set apart certain funds for “the services and expenses of attorneys to be employed to assist in cases and the prosecution of claims in which the commonwealth is interested.” Appropriation Acts Pa. 1919, No. 42A, p. 39.

In pursuance thereof the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, by telegram of December 1, 1920, employed David A. Reed, an attorney at law and the taxpayer in this ease, in these words: “I have designated you as special counsel to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blair v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McDonald v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Matthews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. David W. Matthews and Christa Matthews, Ronald Davis and Marie Davis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. Burnet v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. McDonald v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API