Legal Opinion

Austin v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. 940302013; CA A86614PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.510 et seq. He argues that the post-conviction court erred in determining that he had received adequate assistance of counsel during the sentencing portion of the trial for his underlying convictions. We affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of rape in the first degree and rape in the third degree. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.355. The underlying facts involved his admitted sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old girl. The sentencing court imposed a 40-month term of imprisonment for the first-degree rape conviction,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Short v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Tush v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API