Legal Opinion

Larry Semenza v. Don Kniss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2008No. DA 07-0185PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Semenza appeals the District Court’s finding that it did not have personal jurisdiction over Stockman’s, and the court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Stockman’s. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issue as follows:

¶3 Did the District Court err in finding it did not have personal jurisdiction over Stockman’s?

BACKGROUND

¶4 Larry Semenza (“Semenza”) is a livestock dealer doing business in Montana as Semenza Cattle Company. Don Kniss (“Kniss”) is an Oklahoma resident who has bought and sold cattle, but is not a registered or bonded dealer. The two were introduced through a mutual business…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prindel v. Ravalli CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cimmaron Corp. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kuhr v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Phelps v. FramptonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. J & L IMPLEMENT CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Spoja v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Smith v. Farmers Union Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hansard Mining, Inc. v. McLeanMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API