Legal Opinion

Smith v. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2011No. DA 10-0638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Plaintiffs Patrick and Pamela Smith (the “Smiths”) appeal the judgment of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, granting Defendant Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Company’s (“FUMIC”) motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. The following issues are presented on appeal:

¶2 1. Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to FUMIC.

¶3 2. Whether the District Court erred in denying Smiths’ motion for partial summary judgment.

¶4 We reverse the District Court on the first issue, and affirm the court’s ruling on the second issue.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Triffin v. DillaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Dominique Dubost v. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClue v. Safeco InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hinebaugh v. McRaeMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Capital One, NA v. GuthrieMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Villarreal v. First Presidio BankDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
  5. D'Hooge v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API