Folly Farms I, Inc. v. Trustees of the Clients' Security Trust Fund of the Bar
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In the second trip of this controversy to this Court we are obliged to determine whether claimants, Folly Farms I, Inc. et al. (Folly Farms or the claimants), are entitled to reimbursement from the Clients’ Security Trust Fund of the Bar of Maryland. 1 We shall consider whether the defalcation arose from an attorney-client relationship and whether the claimants were guilty of negligence. If the claim did not arise from such a relationship, or if the claimants were negligent, their claim for reimbursement by the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund (the trustees) must be denied. We…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State Insurance Commissioner v. National Bureau of Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Baltimore Building & Construction Trades Council v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.