Lepak v. Lepak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action in quasi contract to recover for improvements alleged to have been made by plaintiff on land of defendant Andrew S. Lepak. There was a dismissal as to defendant Francis J. Lepak. Plaintiff had a verdict against defendant Andrew, who appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
•Plaintiff is the wife of defendant Francis J. Lepak. They are estranged and not living together; The defendants are brothers. The involved real estate is a lake-shore summer residence property owned by defendant Andrew. Plaintiff’s claim is that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burleson v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Miller v. LathropSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Schultz v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Breitengross v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Fjellman v. WellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.