Legal Opinion
Mark R. Hafner v. David Brown Gary Reininger Jonathan Pease Terry Ressin, and David Hahn
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1992No. 92-1155PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Mark Hafner, the appellee, filed a civil suit seeking compensatory and punitive damages against five Baltimore City Police Officers — David Hahn, David Brown, Jonathan Pease, Gary Reininger, and Terry Ressin — in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Hafner claimed that the officers deprived him of his constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 through the use of excessive force during arrest and that they acted in conspiracy to violate his rights. After initial jury deliberations and supplementary jury instructions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hampton v. HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Hinkle v. City of ClarksburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation, and Daniel P. Batchelor, Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation Daniel P. BatchelorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Glenda Westmoreland v. TWC Administration LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.