Legal Opinion

People v. Glennon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1990No. A047950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a restitution fine of $10,000 should be stricken because the trial court failed to advise appellant of the fine prior to accepting his plea of no contest. We conclude that although appellant has failed to show that he was prejudiced by the court’s failure to so advise, he must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant was the purchasing manager for the biochemistry and biophysics departments of the University of California at San Francisco. Utilizing his own outside company,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Ronald E.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. ManchenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. VictorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. WriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API