Noland Co., Inc. v. Poovey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
I. Defendant Poovey’s Appeal
Defendant Poovey first contends that it was error for the trial court to deny his motions for directed verdict. Poovey insists that plaintiff presented insufficient evidence of the number and kind of goods that it delivered to him for use in the job at the Center and for which it now claims Poovey is indebted to it for payment. In order to prove the quantity and price of the materials and supplies it allegedly delivered to defendant Poovey plaintiff introduced into evidence some 26 exhibits consisting of invoices and freight bills listing the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Bond v. Pickett Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- G. R. Little Agency, Inc. v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- All Points Capital Corp. v. Laurel Hill Paper Co. (In Re Laurel Hill Paper Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Woodruff v. ShufordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Franklin Grading Co. v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.