Woodruff v. Shuford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict. We disagree.
*262In general,
[i]n considering any motion for directed verdict [under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 50], the trial court must view all the evidence that supports the non-movant’s claim as being true and that evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the non-movant, giving to the non-movant the benefit of every reasonable inference that may legitimately be drawn from the evidence with contradictions, conflicts, and inconsistencies being resolved in the non-movant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Paris v. MICHAEL KREITZ JR., PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Mahaffey v. SoderoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- All Points Capital Corp. v. Laurel Hill Paper Co. (In Re Laurel Hill Paper Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Franklin Grading Co. v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991